Sunday, July 12, 2009

A Time to speak ...

At 2:00 p.m. on Thursday I attended the World Mission Committee's hearing on Resolution D020, which would commit the Episcopal Church to "provisional" agreement to sections 1-3 of the Anglican Covenant draft recently reviewed by the Anglican Consultative Council (kind of like an executive council for the Communion). This time I showed up in time to sign up to give a testimonial, and here's what I said (I first gave this from some quick notes, since I was the fifth person to speak, so I needed to adapt to what others had said before):

"A covenant does not support an abstract idea, a happy thought, or a vague notion: it establishes a relationship. For the people of God, covenants establish a relationship between the Triune God and humanity. A relationship initiated by God's grace and given as a gift. A relationship in which humanity lives in a redeemed accountability and a joyful dependence upon God. From the Scriptures, we learn that Covenants are initiated at turning points, kairos times, to point the way forward, to reveal a destination or victory prepared beforehand by God.

The Anglican Covenant is not a happy thought, a good idea, or a vague historical inheritance. This committee, of all the committees of this convention, should know that the Anglican Communion is a web of relationships. Relationships like the one I have with Bishop Bullen Dolli: I have eaten in his tukol, I have wept at the foundation of his bombed out house, I have taught his clergy, I have celebrated communion with him. This web of relationships, this Communion, is given as a gift by God and sustained by His grace. It is a web of relationships in which we live in mutual accountability and joyful interdependence.

Friends in Christ, this is a turning point, a kairos time, in the life of our Communion, and I am convinced that we must engage in the Covenant process -- and that is what "provisional" means to me: process. An Anglican Covenant is required, in my judgment, to point the way forward, to reveal the destination prepared beforehand for us by our Lord. A destination revealed by the name of our Church, itself: restored and redeemed communion with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Thank you very much for the opportunity to speak today."

So that's what I said: believe it or not, I got it in within the two minute limit (although the chair was telling me time was up for my last sentence!). I also had the opportunity to answer two questions from members of the panel, which gave me additional time to flesh out the case for the Convention to adopt a pro-Covenant resolution. We'll see what happens, but simply the opportunity to speak in this forum on behalf of something I care deeply about is deeply gratifying.

3 comments:

  1. When you get back could you explain what 'sections 1-3 of the Anglican Covenant' is and what impact this will have locally and/or globally?
    Or recommend what I can read that will explain this?
    Thanks,
    Rachelle Blake

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just read the Anglican Covenant and I am a bit confused about the third section. If a body is truly autonomous would it be necessary to submit to the Arch-bishop of Cantebury or canonical laws, etc? Would theological debate be necessary if a body is autonomous? Maybe I am thinking of autonomy in too extreme terms. But, if a body is autonomous couldn't that body decide that the 4 governing criteria is out of touch with society and go their on way? Would that autonomous body still be in communion with the larger body?
    Rachelle Blake
    PS. I recently was in Glendale, CA and hated anytime I had to go somewhere in a car. I wanted to walk everywhere so I could take in the sites and smells of the familiar CA landscape. I don't know what they are called, but I love those trees with the purple flowers that are all over LA.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fr. Rob,

    Good going on your witness to the committee. Don't let them push you around!!

    Ross

    ReplyDelete